New Research Suggests Cats and Dogs’ ‘Moms’ and’ Dads’ Are Really Taking Care of Their Pets | Pets


Non-parents were more likely to be the general caregivers. This finding also makes sense since parents often adopt or purchase pets for help their children learn responsibility and take care of others. Pet owners without children invest time, money, and emotional energy directly into their pets.

Non-parents reported higher rates of general attachment to their animals. They more often viewed their pets as individuals. Non-parents were also more likely to use familial terms such as “parent”, “child”, “children” and “guardians” when referring to their relationships with their pets.

Caring for another being can be rewarding and rewarding. Delmaine Donson / E + via Getty Images

It is this difference, combined with evidence from my previous research that these people meet the species-specific needs of the dogs and cats they care for, that suggests that parenting for pets is really parenting for animals. of company. While the details may look quite different – attending training classes instead of school functions, or offering scent walks for dogs instead of coloring books for kids – the two practices serve the same evolved function. Whether it’s a child or a pet, people meet the same evolved need to care for, teach, and love another sensitive one.

My colleagues and I continue to collect data from around the world on how people live with animals. So far, this study provides evidence that, perhaps rather than being evolved to parent, humans are evolved to nurture. And as a result, who and when we are parents is much more flexible than you might initially think.

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.